These are interesting Facts: It appears that we should join the current hysteria and suggest the evidence shows that all Guns of registered Democrats should be confiscated. We know who they are - they're registered! Why is it that those who steal guns, who then go and kill movie goers and children in school have never been a conservative NRA member? Ft Hood - Registered Democrat - Muslim Columbine - Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals Virginia Tech - Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff - Registered Democrat Colorado Theater - Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal Connecticut School Shooter - Registered Democrat; hated Christians John Hinkley Jr. Hated Ronald Regan, Registered Democrat Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme, Member of Charles Manson Cult All Liberal Democrats. Sirhan Sirhan Registered Democrat and Muslim Chicago: December 28, 2012 Murders reached 500 for the year 2012, and 2013 is ahead of that pace... Want to guess how many of the Shooters are Democrats? INTERESTING..., isn't it? Why do Progressive Liberals want to take away Guns from Law Abiding Conservatives???
Friday, January 25, 2013
Democrat's guns should be confiscated
Friday, January 18, 2013
Quote of the Day
Paradoxical Quote of the day from Ben Stein:
“Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured… but not everyone must prove they are a citizen.”
Now add this,
“Many of those who refuse, or are unable, to prove they are citizens will receive free insurance paid for by those that are forced to buy insurance because they are citizens.”
“Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured… but not everyone must prove they are a citizen.”
Now add this,
“Many of those who refuse, or are unable, to prove they are citizens will receive free insurance paid for by those that are forced to buy insurance because they are citizens.”
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Saturday, January 5, 2013
Cutting the debt
Someone emailed this to me. Just another example of how we are being duped. Are we really this stupid of a Nation to not understand what Obama and the rest of the guys in Washington are doing to us?
I'm cutting back and you may want to also....
I'm going to bite the bullet, too!!!!
President Obama ordered the cabinet to cut $100,000,000.00 ($100
million) from the $3,500,000,000,000.00 ($3.5 trillion) federal budget.
I'm so impressed by this sacrifice that I have decided to do the same
thing with my personal budget. I spend about $2,000 a month on
groceries, household expenses, medicine, utilities, etc., but it's time
to get out the budget cutting axe, go through my expenses, and cut back.
I'm going to cut my spending at exactly the same ratio (1/35,000) of my
total budget. After doing the math, it looks like instead of spending
$2,000 a month, I'm going to have to cut that number by six cents. Yes,
I'm going to have to get by with $1999.94, but that's what sacrifice is
all about.
I'll just have to do without some things, that are, frankly, luxuries –
six cents worth.
Did this President actually think no one would do the math? Please send
this to everyone on your list so people understand how idiotic a $100
million cut is in a $3.5 trillion budget – ludicrous!!!!!!!
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation...
One is by sword...
The other is by debt."
John Adams 1826
I'm going to bite the bullet, too!!!!
President Obama ordered the cabinet to cut $100,000,000.00 ($100
million) from the $3,500,000,000,000.00 ($3.5 trillion) federal budget.
I'm so impressed by this sacrifice that I have decided to do the same
thing with my personal budget. I spend about $2,000 a month on
groceries, household expenses, medicine, utilities, etc., but it's time
to get out the budget cutting axe, go through my expenses, and cut back.
I'm going to cut my spending at exactly the same ratio (1/35,000) of my
total budget. After doing the math, it looks like instead of spending
$2,000 a month, I'm going to have to cut that number by six cents. Yes,
I'm going to have to get by with $1999.94, but that's what sacrifice is
all about.
I'll just have to do without some things, that are, frankly, luxuries –
six cents worth.
Did this President actually think no one would do the math? Please send
this to everyone on your list so people understand how idiotic a $100
million cut is in a $3.5 trillion budget – ludicrous!!!!!!!
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation...
One is by sword...
The other is by debt."
John Adams 1826
Friday, January 4, 2013
Restoring the american Spirit
The following is some excerpts a great article by Randall DeSoto:
Ronald
Reagan, who is credited with restoring the American spirit during the
1980s–as well as reestablishing our economic and military might as
second to none–warned that the United States place as a “shining city on
a hill” would be lost, unless active steps were taken to pass on the
vision. President Reagan said in his Farewell Address,
“If we forget what we did, we won’t know who we are. I’m warning of an
eradication of the American memory that could result, ultimately, in an
erosion of the American spirit.”
Evidence that Reagan’s warning is coming to pass can be seen in Washington today. The willingness of President Obama and many members of Congress to divide Americans for political gain over taxes, while in no way even beginning to address the country’s true fiscal cliff of pending national bankruptcy indicates we have forgotten the lessons of the [past]. The good news is that we have been here before.
The first era when the United States faced a crisis in spirit came only eleven years after the country declared its independence. In fact, many prominent political leaders, including George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and James Madison, wondered if the fledgling nation was going to survive due to the inherent weaknesses found in the Articles of Confederation. In May 1787, delegates from the states gathered in Philadelphia at Independence Hall, where to the Declaration had been signed, to take on the great challenge of creating a new form of government. However, after five weeks of deliberations little progress had been made.
In the midst of another discouraging day, Franklin signaled the Constitutional Convention’s President, Washington, that he wished to address the body. He first marveled at how being so far into the proceedings, and “groping as it were in the dark to find political truth, and scarce able to distinguish it when presented to us” producing as many “noes as ayes” on any given question, how it had not occurred to any of them to humbly ask “the Father of lights to illuminate our understandings.” Dr. Franklin, the oldest member of the Convention at eighty-one, reminded the delegates that during the Revolutionary War, when he and his fellow members of the Continental Congress were “sensible of the danger,” they prayed daily, and their prayers were answered. “All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a Superintending providence in our favor.”
Franklin continued, “And have we now forgotten that powerful friend? I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth – that God governs in the affairs of men…We have been assured, Sir, in the sacred writings, that ‘except the Lord build the House they labour in vain that build it’ [Psalm 127:1]. I firmly believe this; and I also believe without his concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of Babel: We shall be divided by our little partial local interests; our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and by word down to future ages.”
The delegates heeded Franklin’s words, in part, a few days later when the convention recessed to commemorate the Fourth of July. Together they attended a church service, prayed, heard a patriotic oration and participated in other events celebrating the momentous day. When they reconvened on July 5th, the political climate in the room had changed, and the delegates were able come together and create the longest standing form of government in the world today.
As in times past, our spirit and nation can be renewed, but it will require the same ingredients that have led to renewal in the past: both faith in God and the wisdom He can provide and faith in our Founding ideals of limited constitutional government.
Ronald
Reagan, who is credited with restoring the American spirit during the
1980s–as well as reestablishing our economic and military might as
second to none–warned that the United States place as a “shining city on
a hill” would be lost, unless active steps were taken to pass on the
vision. President Reagan said in his Farewell Address,
“If we forget what we did, we won’t know who we are. I’m warning of an
eradication of the American memory that could result, ultimately, in an
erosion of the American spirit.”Evidence that Reagan’s warning is coming to pass can be seen in Washington today. The willingness of President Obama and many members of Congress to divide Americans for political gain over taxes, while in no way even beginning to address the country’s true fiscal cliff of pending national bankruptcy indicates we have forgotten the lessons of the [past]. The good news is that we have been here before.
The first era when the United States faced a crisis in spirit came only eleven years after the country declared its independence. In fact, many prominent political leaders, including George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and James Madison, wondered if the fledgling nation was going to survive due to the inherent weaknesses found in the Articles of Confederation. In May 1787, delegates from the states gathered in Philadelphia at Independence Hall, where to the Declaration had been signed, to take on the great challenge of creating a new form of government. However, after five weeks of deliberations little progress had been made.
In the midst of another discouraging day, Franklin signaled the Constitutional Convention’s President, Washington, that he wished to address the body. He first marveled at how being so far into the proceedings, and “groping as it were in the dark to find political truth, and scarce able to distinguish it when presented to us” producing as many “noes as ayes” on any given question, how it had not occurred to any of them to humbly ask “the Father of lights to illuminate our understandings.” Dr. Franklin, the oldest member of the Convention at eighty-one, reminded the delegates that during the Revolutionary War, when he and his fellow members of the Continental Congress were “sensible of the danger,” they prayed daily, and their prayers were answered. “All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a Superintending providence in our favor.”
Franklin continued, “And have we now forgotten that powerful friend? I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth – that God governs in the affairs of men…We have been assured, Sir, in the sacred writings, that ‘except the Lord build the House they labour in vain that build it’ [Psalm 127:1]. I firmly believe this; and I also believe without his concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of Babel: We shall be divided by our little partial local interests; our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and by word down to future ages.”
The delegates heeded Franklin’s words, in part, a few days later when the convention recessed to commemorate the Fourth of July. Together they attended a church service, prayed, heard a patriotic oration and participated in other events celebrating the momentous day. When they reconvened on July 5th, the political climate in the room had changed, and the delegates were able come together and create the longest standing form of government in the world today.
As in times past, our spirit and nation can be renewed, but it will require the same ingredients that have led to renewal in the past: both faith in God and the wisdom He can provide and faith in our Founding ideals of limited constitutional government.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Fiscal Cliff Deal
""The bipartisan package allows taxes to rise on American households for
the first time in a generation, marking a 180-degree Republican shift
from the 2011 debt limit showdown when the GOP balked at closing
corporate jet loopholes worth a couple billion dollars. The bill is a
wild swing: It raises revenue by $620 billion and cuts spending by only
$12 billion.""
“Today’s agreement enshrines, I think, a principle into law that will remain in place for as long as I am president,” Obama said after the House voted. “The deficit needs to be reduced in a way that is balanced. Everyone pays their fair share. Everyone does their part. That is how our economy works best. That is how we grow.” (Since when is everyone paying their fair share? What does Fair share really mean to Obama and the liberals. And how does the economy grow when only a few are paying taxes and the rest are spending it on frivolous stuff?)
“Today’s agreement enshrines, I think, a principle into law that will remain in place for as long as I am president,” Obama said after the House voted. “The deficit needs to be reduced in a way that is balanced. Everyone pays their fair share. Everyone does their part. That is how our economy works best. That is how we grow.” (Since when is everyone paying their fair share? What does Fair share really mean to Obama and the liberals. And how does the economy grow when only a few are paying taxes and the rest are spending it on frivolous stuff?)
Al Gore is at it again
Article from Politico:
Before Al-Jazeera, there was Glenn Beck.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Glenn Beck’s media company, The Blaze, approached Current Media (Al Gore's company) about a sale last year, but was told in the words of one source that “the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view.”
The Blaze “reached out to them to buy it,” a source familiar with the talks told POLITICO. “They would have replaced Current programming with The Blaze programming, but were told on initial calls that [Current] wouldn’t sell to someone they weren’t ideologically in line with.”
In explaining the reasons for selling to Al-Jazeera, Current co-founder and CEO Joel Hyatt told the Journal that the Qatari-based broadcaster "was founded with the same goals we had for Current," including "to give voice to those whose voices are not typically heard" and "to speak truth to power."
Those familiar with Al-Jazeera English know that it is a straightforward, hard-hitting and thorough news-gathering channel. But critics on the right will no doubt find irony in the fact that Current, which was co-founded by climate change advocate Al Gore, agreed to be bought out by a broadcaster owned by the Qatari government, and therefore funded by oil.
Those critics will also find irony in the fact that Gore and Current wanted to close the deal before Dec. 31, in order to avoid the higher tax rates that were to take effect on Jan. 1 — a detail flagged by Brian Stelter, who broke the news about Al-Jazeera's bid. (The deal was not signed until Jan. 2.)
Beck will likely have a field day with this, not least because Al-Jazeera once ran an op-ed comparing him to a terrorist.
Before Al-Jazeera, there was Glenn Beck.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Glenn Beck’s media company, The Blaze, approached Current Media (Al Gore's company) about a sale last year, but was told in the words of one source that “the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view.”
The Blaze “reached out to them to buy it,” a source familiar with the talks told POLITICO. “They would have replaced Current programming with The Blaze programming, but were told on initial calls that [Current] wouldn’t sell to someone they weren’t ideologically in line with.”
In explaining the reasons for selling to Al-Jazeera, Current co-founder and CEO Joel Hyatt told the Journal that the Qatari-based broadcaster "was founded with the same goals we had for Current," including "to give voice to those whose voices are not typically heard" and "to speak truth to power."
Those familiar with Al-Jazeera English know that it is a straightforward, hard-hitting and thorough news-gathering channel. But critics on the right will no doubt find irony in the fact that Current, which was co-founded by climate change advocate Al Gore, agreed to be bought out by a broadcaster owned by the Qatari government, and therefore funded by oil.
Those critics will also find irony in the fact that Gore and Current wanted to close the deal before Dec. 31, in order to avoid the higher tax rates that were to take effect on Jan. 1 — a detail flagged by Brian Stelter, who broke the news about Al-Jazeera's bid. (The deal was not signed until Jan. 2.)
Beck will likely have a field day with this, not least because Al-Jazeera once ran an op-ed comparing him to a terrorist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)