Saturday, February 21, 2015

3 strikes and you are out of Insurance

Article by Melissa Quinn
 Dec. 26, 2014, was strike three for Pamela Weldin.
The day after Christmas, Weldin, of Minatare, Neb., had logged on to Facebook to find a message from a friend of hers. Included in the note was a link to an article from the Omaha World-Herald announcing that CoOportunity Health, a nonprofit health insurance company offering plans in Nebraska and Iowa, had been taken over by state regulators.
The insurer, one of 23 Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans, or co-ops, started with the backing of the federal government and received $145 million in loans from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. But, CoOportunity’s expenses and medical claims would far exceed its revenue for 2014.
“Merry Christmas to me,” Weldin, a dental hygienist turned Pampered Chef director, said in an interview with The Daily Signal of when she read the article.
A month later, Iowa Insurance Commissioner Nick Gerhart announced his intent to liquidate CoOportunity Health and encouraged those who were covered by the nonprofit to seek insurance elsewhere.
For Weldin, 58, the insurer’s liquidation marked the third time she would lose her health insurance under Obamacare, the third time she would head to HealthCare.gov to shop for coverage, and the third time she would have to purchase a brand new plan.
“I’ve been pulled into the middle of all this through no fault of my own,” she said, “and there’s nothing fair about it. It is what it is, and you move forward.”
Obamacare’s Co-Ops
Co-ops are no stranger to the insurance market, and lawmakers hoped the nonprofit insurance companies would help infuse competition and choice into markets where there were limited options.
However, the co-ops created under the law would be slightly different from those already in existence—to help the new insurers get off the ground and meet state reserve requirements, the federal government provided $2 billion in startup and solvency loans.
Twenty-three co-ops serving 26 states were ultimately licensed and received federal loans including CoOportunity.
According to the latest quarterly filings, more than 520,000 people enrolled in insurance coverage through the co-ops through September.
An analysis conducted by The Daily Signal earlier this month, though, found that all but one of the co-ops experienced operating losses through September.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services did not return The Daily Signal’s request for comment.
Strike One
In the months leading up to the Affordable Care Act’s implementation on Oct. 1, 2013, millions of Americans began receiving notices from their health insurance companies informing them their policies had been cancelled.
Weldin was one of them.
The Nebraska woman, who was diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome 15 years ago, had purchased catastrophic coverage through Humana after moving from San Diego, Calif., which she kept until 2013—right before Obamacare’s implementation.
That year, she received a cancellation notice from the insurance giant. The company had decided to pull out of Nebraska and wouldn’t sell plans to Nebraskans through HealthCare.gov, the federal government’s health insurance exchange. Eight other insurance companies followed suit.
Cancellation Humana 1
(Photo: Pamela Weldin)
By the start of 2014, Weldin would be left without insurance.
Like millions of other Americans who also received cancellation notices, she logged on to HealthCare.gov on Oct. 1, 2013, to browse and purchase new health insurance. But, like millions of other Americans who attempted to sign on to the site, she was a victim of its disastrous launch.
For two months, Weldin attempted to complete her application and was successful by mid-December.
Through CoOportunity, Weldin purchased a platinum level plan with premiums costing $307 a month.
Strike Two
Weldin’s insurance with CoOportunity went into effect Jan. 1, 2014, and she had the insurance for most of that year.
Like some consumers, Weldin had issues with the coverage she received through the law. Her original doctor, located seven hours away in Colorado, was no longer in network, and Weldin’s plan included services she would never need. At 58 years old, the former dental hygienist had a difficult time understanding why she would need maternity coverage, but it was included in her plan.
Her new platinum plan included a $2,500 deductible, and Weldin qualified for the tax credits touted by the administration.
Then, in November 2014, CoOportunity notified Weldin that they would no longer be offering platinum plans.
(Photo: Pamela Weldin)
(Photo: Pamela Weldin)
For the second time, Weldin “muddled through” HealthCare.gov to purchase a new health insurance plan. Again, she encountered issues with the website and had to wait until December before securing coverage with CoOportunity. Weldin ultimately selected a silver-level plan for $165 a month.
“Here you are, trying to do the right thing, trying to be responsible and have coverage and be diligent,” she said. “And still, I have all these problems and glitches and everything.”
Strike Three
It wasn’t long after purchasing her new insurance with the co-op that Weldin learned CoOportunity was in financial trouble.
One day after Christmas, she read that Iowa state regulators had taken over the nonprofit insurance company, and officials warned it could go under.
CoOportunity originally expected just 12,000 consumers to purchase coverage through the nonprofit. They ended up enrolling 120,000, many of whom were sicker and had costly health issues.
As a result, CoOportunity’s expenses and medical claims exceeded their revenue from monthly premiums, which were priced too low.
The state asked the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for additional money, but the agency denied its request.
“You had a perfect storm happen here,” Gerhart said.
For Weldin, the new year brought grim news. She learned that CoOportunity would be liquidated. She would be out of health insurance yet again.
150217_ObamacareLoss+3_Quinn
(Photo: Pamela Weldin)
“The CoOportunity people were helpful and wonderful,” Weldin said. “They answered questions. I really didn’t end up dealing with people who were adversarial or contentious. They sincerely wanted to help people and give out new information, and now they’re going to be unemployed.”
Gerhart told The Daily Signal the state acted quickly in notifying consumers about CoOportunity’s liquidation to ensure no one would have a lapse in coverage. So far, more than 80,000 have moved to other plans.
“They faced a crisis, and their claims were eating up all the surplus and reserve [money],” he said. “It was an unfortunate situation, but we had to step in.”
For the third time in less than two years, Weldin had lost her health insurance. And for the third time, she went to HealthCare.gov to select a new plan from a new company.
Now, Weldin has health insurance through Blue Cross Blue Shield. The “silver lining,” she said, is that Weldin is able to see her original doctor and nurse practitioner in Colorado. But the cost of her monthly premiums increased to $235.
“We have a president who said, If you like your plan, you can keep it. If you like your doctor, you can keep it. You will have choices,’” Weldin said. “All three things were an outright lie.”

Policy Picture

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Scott Walker Dismisses ‘Elitist’ Criticism That He Dropped Out of College

Article by Josh Feldman
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker dropped out of college, and some critics are saying this should be a dealbreaker for his potential presidential bid.Howard Dean, for example, said last week that Walker might be “unknowledgeable” and “the issue is, how well educated is this guy?”
Walker appeared on Fox News tonight and told Megyn Kelly it’s just the “elitist government-knows-best top-down approach from Washington,” and argued the country hasn’t exactly been faring well under an Ivy League president.
To be clear, Walker isn’t dismissing the importance of college outright. He hopes his own sons finish their college education, but at the same time, he said, “you don’t have to have that to be successful.”
Walker and Kelly were also amused at how the media has been doing quite a bit of digging into why he left. Kelly in particular found it interesting that The Washington Post found a former teacher of Walker’sto say that as a 19-year-old, he was somewhat bored with the subject material he was being taught. No. Really?
See more at http://www.mediaite.com/tv/scott-walker-dismisses-elitist-criticism-that-he-dropped-out-of-college/

Scott Walker is a conservative hero, and liberals have themselves to blame for it

Article by By Nia-Malika Henderson
Whether it's unions or universities, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) has waged a number of huge fights -- symbolic and otherwise -- with liberals. So far, the fights have only served to bolster his credentials among national conservatives who like nothing more than a Republican willing to poke liberals in the eye.
And now New York Times columnist Gail Collins has thrown Walker another hanging curveball by which to bash liberals and shine in the eyes of conservatives.
In a recent column widely derided as a "hit piece" by conservatives, Collins centered on Walker's breakout speech in Iowa, declaring that it was "his moment."  Known for her stream-of-consciousness writing style, Collins sets herself up as a kind of fact-checker of Walker's record. She blames the governor for cutting state aid to education that led to teacher layoffs -- particularly in regard to one teacher who had been honored.
But there was just one big problem with that assertion: Walker wasn't actually in office when said cuts were made.
The headline -- "Scott Walker Needs an Eraser" -- pretty much said it all, except it wasn't Walker who needed one.
The correction, which came two days after the column was posted, said: "An earlier version of this column incorrectly stated that teacher layoffs in Milwaukee in 2010 happened because Gov. Scott Walker 'cut state aid to education.' The layoffs were made by the city’s school system because of a budget shortfall, before Mr. Walker took office in 2011."
Walker's conservative fans immediately seized on Collins's mistake.
Here's the Weekly Standard:
The battle over the 2016 election is well underway, and the Democratic Party press is pulling no punches. My guess is that over the next 21 months, we will see open warfare against the Republican Party and its candidates, to an even greater degree than in the past.
If we're sticking with the warfare theme, then Walker is liberal enemy No. 1.  And this is a great place for a guy whose star is starting to rise. That's because conservatives are great at turning the enemy (Walker) of their enemy (liberals) into their best friend.
The reaction of conservative media outlets shows that he has some enviable support. They are certainly keeping score. (Walker: 1, Collins: Big Fat Zero.)
It all goes back to the 2012 recall effort, in which unions and liberals overstepped by seeking to remove Walker as governor because of his decision to roll back collective bargaining rights for public-sector unions. They lost, and suddenly they had created a world-beating conservative hero who just won another election in a blue-leaning state. He has won three races in four-plus years -- a fact he will remind crowds of often, and one that wouldn't be true without that overreach.
Now, with another defeat of Collins and the "liberal media," the legend of Walker -- slayer of all things liberal -- continues to grow. In a crowded field in which everyone will clamor for the conservative label, Walker has that distinct advantage.
And liberals largely have themselves to blame.
See more at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/02/18/scott-walker-is-a-conservative-hero-and-liberals-have-themselves-to-blame-for-it/

"Are you a Muslim?"

Article by 
A man approached a group of people at a bus stop just outside of Detroit on Saturday and asked them “if they were Muslims,” according to police. When two people answered that they were not, the man allegedly pulled out a 3-inch folding knife and started viciously stabbing one of them.
One of the victims suffered five stab wounds during the assault while the other person was stabbed in the hand while he tried to stop the suspect. Both victims, reportedly in their 50s, were transported to a hospital and later released after treatment for non-life threatening injuries.
Police arrested 39-year-old Terrence Lavaron Thomas “within minutes” after the attack, the Washington Post reports.
(Southfield Police Department)
(Southfield Police Department)
Southfield Police Chief Eric Hawkins told the Post several people at the bus stop were “engaged in conversation” before Thomas inquired about their faith. When the two victims revealed they were not Muslims, Thomas attacked “without provocation,” according to Hawkins.
More from the report:
Thomas was charged with two counts of assault with intent to murder, one count of carrying a dangerous weapon, and one count of possession of a controlled substance — all state charges.
Thomas could face a state charge of ethnic intimidation as well, Hawkins said, but county prosecutors were still determining whether it would be added or not.
Though the shocking crime is still under investigation, Hawkins also confirmed that Thomas claimed to be a Muslim and officers “do know that he was not happy that [the victims] indicated that they were not Muslim,” the Washington Post adds.
Police say Thomas was carrying two knives, including the one used to attack the victims, and marijuana at the time of his arrest.
See more at http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/02/17/he-asked-group-at-bus-stop-if-they-were-muslims-when-two-answered-he-tried-to-kill-them-police/

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

What the Mormons Know About Welfare

Feb 18, 2012 
By Naomi Schaefer Riley 
Salt Lake City
Mitt Romney has raised the issue of the social safety net. Washington could learn from the lesson of his church.
Ever since Mitt Romney said he was "not concerned about the very poor" but would fix America's social safety net "if it needs repair," conservatives and liberals have been frantically making suggestions. Gov. Romney says he would consider options like restructuring Medicaid. But if he wants to see a welfare system that lets almost no one fall through the cracks while at the same time ensuring that its beneficiaries don't become lifelong dependents, he could look to his own church.
As I ride in a golf cart through a new 15-acre warehouse on the outskirts of Utah's capital, I can't help but wonder: How many Wal-Marts would fit in here? How many burgers can you make from 4,400 industrial pallets of frozen meat? And how do they keep this place cleaner than my kitchen floor?
Dedicated last month(2012), the Bishops Central Storehouse contains a two-year supply of food to support the Mormon church's welfare system in the U.S. and Canada (primarily for church members in need) and its humanitarian program, which sends food, medical supplies and other necessities to the needy (of all faiths) world-wide.
In addition to goods from canned peaches to emergency generators, the facility also houses the church's own trucking company, complete with 43 tractors and 98 trailers, as well as a one-year supply of fuel, parts and tires for the vehicles. Just in case.
The storehouse is not only a kind of physical marvel——it has been built to withstand an earthquake with a magnitude as high as 7.5——but also a symbol of strength and self-sufficiency.
Launched during the Great Depression, the Mormon welfare system was designed by church leaders as a way to match the armies of the unemployed faithful with some of the nearby farms that needed temporary labor. As storehouse manager Richard Humpherys explains, goods and services were traded so that if a father needed food for his family he could get some in exchange for, say, repairing the fence of a widow down the road.
In 1936, Heber Grant, one of the church leaders, reported the reasoning behind this effort: "Our primary purpose was to set up insofar as it might be possible, a system under which the curse of idleness would be done away with, the evils of a dole abolished and independence, industry, thrift and self respect be once more established among our people. The aim of the Church is help the people to help themselves. Work is to be re-enthroned as the ruling principle of the lives of our Church membership."
Over the ensuing decades, the church acquired farms and ranches of its own. It built grain silos and dairies and canneries to store and process the food. By the end of World War II, church leaders had enough in the way of reserves that they contacted President Truman to ask if they might assist in feeding and clothing the destitute across Europe. The president readily agreed.
Because it has members on the ground around the world, the church continues to be an important force in bringing food and supplies to the impoverished and victims of natural disasters. Local church leaders contact the central headquarters in Salt Lake City to tell them what is needed——gauze pads, school supplies, wheelchairs——and the church does its best to accommodate.
The Department of Defense recently visited the new storehouse to find out how the Mormons are able to mobilize so quickly, and there is an almost military sense of efficiency and strategy to the church's efforts. When Hurricane Katrina struck, for instance, the church had positioned its fully loaded trucks in a kind of semicircle from South Carolina to Texas because no one knew how the storm was going to move. The church used reserves of fuel that it has placed around the country, and drivers were able to bring full tanker trucks into New Orleans, powering rescue vehicles and even chain saws to remove tree limbs.
Most of the inventory in the central storehouse, though, goes to supply more than 100 smaller storehouses around the country, plus hundreds of soup kitchens and homeless shelters of other religious communities around North America. Members of the Mormon church who find themselves in difficult circumstances can go to their local bishop and ask for aid.
The bishop then fills out an order allowing them to go and receive food from the local storehouse. Seventy percent of the items on the shelves are produced by the church itself and the remainder are purchased at steep wholesale discounts. According to Rick Foster, who oversees a smaller storehouse in Salt Lake City along with the cannery and dairy at Welfare Square (the original site of all the church's welfare services), people depend on the food at the storehouse for an average of three to six months.
That's because the church's goal is to help them get back on their feet as soon as possible. And the storehouse is only one of the tools at the disposal of local bishops, who may also refer members to other church programs, including employment counseling or family services. The bishop may even use money from a fund at his disposal to help pay for education, housing or utilities.
The labor behind the farming, food production, counseling and even cattle ranching is provided almost entirely by volunteers. Some are retired folks who come in every day. Other times an entire ward, or congregation, will come for the day, each of the members standing on an industrial assembly line packaging bread, processing cheese or sealing jars of apple sauce.
Regular tithing by church members helps pay for the facilities, but the primary source of capital support is the Mormons' monthly fast, as church members are asked to contribute what they would have spent on two meals. Many give much more, says Mr. Foster.
It is safe to assume that Mr. Romney is among them. The tens of millions of dollars he has given the church over the years have raised suspicion in some quarters. What does the church do with all that cash? Wouldn't that money have been better spent paying a higher income-tax rate? But his donations are supporting the kind of safety net that government can never hope to create. Jesus may have said the poor will always be with you, but he didn't say Medicaid would.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A REPUBLICAN AND A DEMOCRAT

Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton were walking down the street when
they came to a homeless person.  Romney gave the homeless person
his business card and told him to come to his office for a job.  He then
took $20 out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person.

Hillary was very impressed, so when they came to another homeless
person, she decided to help. She walked over to the homeless person
and gave him directions to the welfare office.  She then reached into
Romney’s pocket and got out $20.

She kept $15 for her administrative fees and gave the homeless person $5.

Now, do you understand the difference ?

Monday, February 16, 2015

When They Have to Pay, ‘Liberal’ College Students Suddenly Revolt Against Obamacare-Like Health Fees

Article by 
What happens when you give college students a taste of Obamacare?
They spit the taste right out of their mouths.
Cornell University students are up in arms over a $350 student health fee that will be assessed to any student who doesn’t buy the university’s health insurance, Casey Breznick, editor-in-chief of the Cornell conservative student paper the Cornell Review, wrote on Legal Insurrection Saturday.
He also noted that Cornell’s fee resembles a national program: the Affordable Care Act’s penalty for those who don’t purchase health insurance.
Breznick wrote:
As Obamacare dictates people must either buy health insurance or pay a tax, Cornell is now requiring students who do not purchase SHIP [university health insurance] pay the health fee. Of course, there are distinctions between each case–namely, attending Cornell is optional whereas paying taxes is required.
Still, the underlying principle behind the fee implementation and Obamacare are the same: the redistribution of wealth in order to provide “for the common good,” as Skorton stated.
[...]
Essentially, both the fee and Obamacare are redistributionist policies which seek to extract from some in order to subsidize others. In some ways, however, the Cornell student health fee is worse, because it’s not only a redistribution of wealth, it is an administrative bailout to the tune of a cool $4 million. It’s a double-whammy of liberal ill-logic and progressive policy.
Some of the most vocal opponents of the fee, Breznick said, are “liberal” students.
“These are the same students who almost surely all vote for Democrats and support redistributionist, big government policies,” Breznick noted, “but when it comes to their own pocket books they are suddenly outraged.”
Breznick appeared on “Fox and Friends” Sunday morning to discuss the issue — and he labeled many of the protesters hypocrites.
Watch Cornell students protest the fee below (content warning: strong language):
See more at http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/02/15/when-they-have-to-pay-liberal-college-students-suddenly-revolt-against-obamacare-like-health-fees/

Monday, February 9, 2015

Military Pilot Complained About Brian Williams' Helicopter Story in 2003

Article by Newsmax

Brian Williams will take a break from anchoring the “NBC Nightly News” amid growing questions about the credibility of his reporting.
Lester Holt will replace Williams for the time being, Williams wrote in a note to his staff on Saturday that said the issue has detracted from the U.S.’s most-watched nightly news broadcast.
“In the midst of a career spent covering and consuming news, it has become painfully apparent to me that I am presently too much a part of the news, due to my actions,” he wrote.
Williams didn’t mention the controversy when he anchored the show Friday evening, hours after NBC confirmed it was investigating its most prominent newsman’s on-air claims that a military helicopter he was traveling in was shot and forced down in the Iraqi desert in 2003. Williams has since retracted his account and apologized after servicemen disputed his story.
The break is temporary, Williams said, writing that he needs a few days to “adequately deal with this issue.” In a story covered on “Nightly News” last week, Williams took Sergeant Major Tim Terpak, who retired with three Bronze Stars, to a hockey game at New York’s Madison Square Garden, where the veteran received a standing ovation.

During the piece, Williams said his helicopter was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade. In fact, the aircraft that Williams was in was following helicopters that came under fire, NBC and Williams reported in correcting the original story.
Don Helus, a pilot in one of the aircraft that did get hit, told CNN’s “Reliable Sources” on Sunday that he had contacted NBC affiliate MSNBC shortly after the attack, concerned about the way it was reported.
“Just to alert them that the facts were incorrect, because, you know, stating that Mr. Williams was not part of our flight,” Helus told CNN’s Brian Stelter. “He was in a different flight.”
He said he tries to keep “an unbiased opinion” about Williams.
Helus never got a response from NBC, Stelter said.

New questions also have been raised about Williams’s telling of his experience during Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. He has said he saw dead bodies float by in the city’s French Quarter, which had minimal flood damage.
That story, one of the biggest of Williams’s career, transpired the first summer after Williams took over the anchor chair in December 2004 at the Comcast Corp.-owned network. Williams has held the job ever since and is the longest-tenured of the three biggest U.S. networks’ news anchors.
“Upon my return, I will continue my career-long effort to be worthy of the trust of those who place their trust in us,” Williams wrote in the note.
If Williams doesn’t return to the anchor chair after NBC’s investigation, the network runs the risk of losing viewers and advertising dollars for “Nightly News.” Keeping Williams, on the other hand, could bruise the network’s credibility and also hurt ratings.

see more at http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/brian-williams-helicopter-pilot-nbc/2015/02/08/id/623480/?ns_mail_uid=42169935&ns_mail_job=1607312_02082015&s=al&dkt_nbr=9fobf6qb

Obama: Christians Did Bad Things 'in the Name of Christ'

Article by Newsmax

President Barack Obama stirred outrage with his speech at the National Prayer Breakfast Thursday, comparing the atrocities committed by ISIS to those of Christians "in the name of Christ."

"Unless we get on our high horse and think that this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ," Obama said. "In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ."
"So it is not unique to one group or one religion," Obama said. "There is a tendency in us, a simple tendency that can pervert and distort our faith."

The comments drew swift reaction. 

Appearing on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV, conservative commentator Pat Buchanan fumed at Obama comparing the extreme barbarity of ISIS to the Crusades.

"He's trying to give them all equivalence to what happened in the 11th century to what's happening today? It's astonishing," Buchanan said.

"The whole idea of the Inquisition in Spain – I mean these things are hundreds of years ago. That was a 30-year war long, long ago.

"I can't think of any atrocities that have really been committed in the name of Christ … There's no justification anywhere in all the books of the New Testament for any kind of violence on the scale of what we just saw with that Jordanian pilot."

Buchanan said Obama has a "real problem with the cold hard truth and reality of our times" regarding terrorism.

"There is an element in the Islamic community worldwide, which has awakened and is embarked on a global crusade of its own to conquer western countries," Buchanan said.

"But first [they want to conquer] Arab and Muslim countries and to impose upon them a Sharia law to expel the Christians, Jews, and the nonbelievers if they're Shiite and not part of what they consider the mainstream.

"They're using all manner of violence in order to achieve this, from Boko Haram to ISIS to Ansar al-Sharia and to al-Qaida. Can the president not see the reality of his own time that he's got to retreat centuries to find what he thinks might be a moral equivalence?"

Buchanan also objected to Obama's reference to racial segregation laws during the Jim Crow era during the same speech. 

"To call it Jim Crow, which was a form of segregation of racists; to say that was rooted in Christianity, it seems to be an absurdity and injustice," he said.

Former U.S. Rep. Allen West said: "President Obama is the gift that keeps on giving,' "The Islamapologist-in-Chief attempted to find moral equivalency between the brutality of ISIS and Christianity."

And in a statement on his website, Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, said "the president should apologize for his insulting comparison."

Former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore, a Republican, said Obama's remarks were "the most offensive I’ve ever heard a President make in my lifetime."

Gilmore said it illustrated that "Obama does not believe in America or the values we all share.  There is no moral equivalency for the horrific behavior of terrorists whose atrocities are shocking and reprehensible"

The president said that while religion is a source of good around the world, people of all faiths have been willing to "hijack religion for their own murderous ends."

Obama called for all people of faiths to show humility about their beliefs and reject the idea that "God speaks only to us and doesn't speak to others."

"No god condones terror," he said. "We are summoned to push back against those who would distort our religion for their nihilistic ends," Obama said at the National Prayer Breakfast.

He singled out the ISIS, calling the militants a "death cult," as well as those responsible for last month's attacks in Paris and deadly assault on a school in Pakistan.

Obama offered a special welcome to a "good friend," the Dalai Lama, seated at a table in front of the dais among the audience of 3,600. Earlier Obama, from the head table, pressed his hands together in a prayer-like position and bowed his head toward the Dalai Lama, then gave him a wave and a broad smile.
It was the first time the president and the Tibetan Buddhist leader attended the same public event.

See more at http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Obama-Christians-ISIS-Prayer-Breakfast/2015/02/05/id/622994/

Chuck Todd: Obama Likes to Spark Trouble at Prayer Breakfast

Article by By Greg Richter

President Barack Obama caused a lot of backlash when he said at Thursday's National Prayer Breakfast that Christians shouldn't get on a "high horse" over Islamic extremism, and "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd thinks that might be just what he was aiming for.

"I have my own theory," NBC host Todd told guest Jon Meacham, who has written on the history of Christianity in America. "He's not a big fan of the Prayer Breakfast, … and I think he almost enjoys creating a rhetorical debate."

Meacham, Random House executive editor and author of "American Gospel: God, the Founding Fathers and the Making of a Nation," wondered why Obama would even bring up the Crusades and the Inquisition in comparison to modern-day Islamic terrorists. 

Obama, he said, failed to mention that the Crusades were "an exception to a rule. And the rule of Christian history in the Middle Ages forward into the modern era was one of Christian humanism. The Crusades ended and the Renaissance began."

Meacham said it is inarguable that Christian faith contributed largely to the rise of democratic capitalism.

"So if you're going to start this debate, it's better not to do it with one or two sentences," he said.

Christianity managed to reform itself over the years, he said, with dark chapters, that ultimately worked toward the light. The hope is that Islam will do the same, he said.

"I'm just not sure how many people are on that 'high horse,'" he added. "So it's a little bit contextless, too."

NBC's chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell appeared later, telling Todd, "You don’t use the word 'Crusades' in any context right now, it’s just too fraught."

"And the week after a pilot is burned alive, in a video shown, you don’t lean over backwards to be philosophical about the sins of the fathers," she said. 'You have to deal with the issue that’s in front of you or don’t deal with it at all."

See more at http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/todd-meet-the-press-obama-trouble/2015/02/08/id/623488/?ns_mail_uid=42169935&ns_mail_job=1607332_02092015&s=al&dkt_nbr=hoedkc9i

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Obama Invokes Slavery and the Crusades During Prayer Breakfast: ‘People Committed Terrible Deeds in the Name of Christ’

article by 
President Barack Obama spoke about religious extremism during an address at Thursday morning’s National Prayer Breakfast, noting that the “twisting and distorting” of faith is “not unique to one group or one religion” and claiming that some Christians also had a history of justifying bad deeds with the name of Jesus.
“We see sectarian war in Syria, the murder of Muslims and Christians in Nigeria, religious war in the Central African Republic, a rising tide of anti-Semitism and hate crimes in Europe, so often perpetrated in the name of religion,” Obama said during his remarks.
From there, the president implored listeners not to forget the negative history that Christianity has had in light of the Crusades and Inquisition — and with America’s own past with slavery.
“And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” he said. “In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”
Speaking about people and faiths more generally, Obama added, “There is a tendency in us, a sinful tendency that can pervert and distort our faith.” 
see more at http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/02/05/obama-invokes-the-crusades-during-prayer-breakfast-people-committed-terrible-deeds-in-the-name-of-christ/

Vaccine

Friday, February 6, 2015

CEO of Gallup calls jobless rate 'big lie' created by White House, Wall Street, media

The chairman of the venerable Gallup research and polling firm says the official U.S. unemployment rate is really an underestimation and a “big lie" perpetuated by the White House, Wall Street and the media.
What CEO and Chairman Jim Clifton revealed in his blog Tuesday about how the Labor Department arrives at the monthly unemployment rate is no secret -- including that Americans who have quit looking for work after four weeks are not included in the survey.

The department's current rate of 5.6 percent unemployment is the lowest since June 2008, with President Obama using his State of the Union address and campaign-style stops across the country to tout an economic recovery.  “Our economy is growing and creating jobs at the fastest pace since 1999,” Obama said in the opening lines of his January 20 address before Congress.“Our unemployment rate is now lower than it was before the financial crisis.”

Clifton says the “cheerleading” for the 5.6 number is “deafening.” “The media loves a comeback story,” he writes. “The White House wants to score political points, and Wall Street would like you to stay in the market.”

Since the start of the Great Recession, which economists largely agree began in late 2007, the unemployment rate peaked at 10 percent in October 2009 and finally got under 6 percent in September 2014. Clifton says Americans out of work for at least four weeks are “as unemployed as one can possibly be” and argues that as many as 30 million of them are now either out of work or severely underemployed.

He points out that an out-of-work engineer, for example, performing a minimum of one hour of work a week, even mowing a lawn for $20, also is not officially counted as unemployed.  In addition, those working part time but wanting full-time work -- the so-called “severely underemployed” -- also are not counted.

“There's no other way to say this,” Clifton says. “The official unemployment rate … amounts to a big lie.”
His arguments are similar to those made by Washington Republicans after the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced the rate each month during the height of the recession. However, Gallup is an 80-year-old, nonpartisan firm.  The bureau did not return a request for comment.

Clifton suggests the biggest misconception about the official rate is that it doesn’t denote “good” full-time jobs. “When the media, talking heads, the White House and Wall Street start reporting the truth -- the percent of Americans in good jobs; jobs that are full time and real -- then we will quit wondering why Americans aren't ‘feeling’ something that doesn't remotely reflect the reality in their lives. And we will also quit wondering what hollowed out the middle class,” he said.