One in five
retirees is likely to return to the workforce this year, thanks to soaring
inflation under President Joe Biden, a new survey found this week.
The historic
inflation crisis in the U.S. continued to impact nearly every member of
American society, and now even those who had resolved to withdraw from work and
enjoy the sunset of their lives are being forced back into the labor market
once again.
The trend is
a remarkable turnaround from the larger-than-usual number of Americans who
entered retirement during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.
What are the
details?
According to
a recent survey commissioned by Resume Builder, 20% of America's retirees are
poised to take a job again in the coming year. Specifically, 8% said that they
are "very likely" to return to the workforce, while 12% said they are
"somewhat likely."
Those set to
re-enter the workforce indicated that they are overwhelmingly doing so in
response to the economic strain brought by rising consumer costs. In fact, 69%
of respondents claimed they would return to the workforce to combat rising
costs associated with the inflation and supply chain crises.
Another
12.5% said they needed extra money to pay off medical debt accrued during the
pandemic. More generally, an eye-opening 83% of those considering
"unretiring" expressed concerns about their finances.
The survey
sought responses from 800 American citizens over the age of 54 and retired.
While
commenting on the survey, career consultant Stacie Haller tried to put a
positive spin on the results.
"There
is no longer a retirement age and people want to be engaged longer," she
said, though acknowledging, "Others are returning to the workplace for
financial reasons, and in this new work world, there are now more options for
them to return with the advent of remote work [and] more part-time work for
older workers who cannot commit to a full workweek."
Another
study, this one put on by job website Indeed, found that "as of March
2022, 3.2% of workers who were retired a year earlier are now employed."
Indeed, too,
came to the same conclusion as Resume Builder. In its analysis of the trend,
the site stated, "Amid a hot labor market and high inflation, retired
workers are returning to work at a rising rate. ‘Unretirements’ are on the rise
as workers who previously said they were retired are now taking jobs
again."
What's the
background?
Earlier this
year, inflation reached a 40-year peak as consumer prices rose 8.5%
year-over-year. The skyrocketing numbers have put the squeeze on many Americans
and caused economic experts to fear that a recession is "inevitable."
After
downplaying inflation for months, calling it only "transitory," the
Biden administration and the Federal Reserve finally admitted the problem to be
serious in recent weeks.
The Fed took
action this week, albeit likely too late, by raising short-term interest rates
by a half-percent — the sharpest rate hike since 2000. More rate hikes are
expected in the coming months.
see more at https://www.theblaze.com/news/biden-inflation-forcing-americans-to-unretire?utm_source=theblaze-7DayTrendingTest&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20Blaze%20PM%20Trending%202022-05-06&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%207%20Day%20Engagement
Elon Musk made a deal to purchase Twitter for roughly $44
billion. The tech billionaire said, "Free speech is the bedrock of a
functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters
vital to the future of humanity are debated." On Friday, Bill Maher blasted
current and previous Twitter management for "failing" to become an
open town square for online discussion. Maher noted that it is time for Twitter
to get a "new sheriff."
On Friday's episode of "Real Time with Bill
Maher," the HBO host welcomed former Democratic Alabama Senator Doug Jones
and MSNBC anchor Ali Velshi to discuss what – if any – moderation Twitter
should have as the online town square.
Maher asked, "Has Twitter failed in setting itself up
in the past as the judge of what can go out there?" He then answered his
own question, "And I would say yes, you have."
Maher delivered a tongue-lashing to Twitter's management by
saying, "You failed when you threw the New York Post off of Twitter for
talking about Hunter Biden's emails. And it turned out that was a real story.
You failed when you said we couldn't read about whether COVID had come from a
lab. You failed!"
Weeks before the 2020 presidential election, Twitter banned
the New York Post for 16 days for sharing damning accusations about an
abandoned laptop owned by Hunter Biden and also censored the story. Last month,
the New York Times and Washington Post finally got around to authenticating the
laptop emails.
Earlier this month, Maher accused left-wing media outlets of
burying the Hunter Biden laptop story.
"It looks like the left-wing media just buried the
story because it wasn't part of their narrative and that's why people don't
trust the media," Maher explained.
Christian satire website The Babylon Bee shared a video of a
Twitter employee being too sensitive about Musk purchasing the social media
platform.
Twitter Employee Undergoes Therapy Over Elon Musk Takeover youtu.be
Twitter quickly and unironically slapped a warning on the
video that claimed the comedic clip "might have sensitive content."
“Our video mocking Twitter employees for being too sensitive
was flagged by Twitter for sensitive content,” Babylon Bee editor-in-chief Kyle
Mann wrote. Musk replied with laughing emojis.
Maher described Twitter as having a "complete lack of
self-awareness" for flagging the video.
"'Sensitive content,' Twitter said," Maher noted.
"In the video, they were making fun of Twitter for being too sensitive.
This is so 'Through the Looking Glass.'"
"This is well within what satire has always been,"
Maher said of The Babylon Bee video. "And the fact that they flagged this
for being insensitive shows their complete lack of self-awareness about what
their own problem is. If that's where the line is, you have failed Twitter. You
do need a new sheriff."
Maher slammed Twitter for becoming a "left-wing
place," according to Fox News. The liberal talk show host stressed,
"Twitter could be a place where you might see an opinion that you didn't
formally consider, and we need that desperately in America."
The HBO host noted, "I'd much rather have Elon Musk
making the rules than a 23-year-old who can't take the joke on Babylon Beeswax,
or whatever the f*** that is."
Maher said of Gen Z, "I mean, this is a generation that
doesn't know what the word ‘violence’ means. They think ‘violence’ means
'anything I don't like.' Their standard of free speech is 'I'm uncomfortable.'
That's not where the standard is, right?"
The "Real Time with Bill Maher" host pilloried the
education system for failing to teach civics to young Americans.
"Civics doesn't exist anymore. They don't know … ‘Free
speech? What the f*** does that mean? It hurt my feelings.’ That's what matters
to them. That's what I worry about. I mean, I hear it all the time," Maher
declared.
see more at https://www.theblaze.com/news/bill-maher-twitter-elon-musk-babylon-bee?utm_source=theblaze-7DayTrendingTest&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20Blaze%20PM%20Trending%202022-04-30&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%207%20Day%20Engagement
Political commentator Scott Jennings delivered a scathing rebuke of President Joe Biden during a recent appearance on CNN. The blistering takedown questioned whether Biden was any different or better on key issues than former President Donald Trump.
"I never imagined how quickly this would all unfold," Jennings said on Thursday's episode of "Anderson Cooper 360." "The person they sold on the campaign, the nice old, you know, moderate grandpa who just wanted to help everybody get along and compromise, is not what we got over the last year."
"He has no mandate really to do much of anything." Jennings continued. "It's amazing that he got a couple of things done when the mandate was really pretty clear – 50/50 Senate, a near 50/50 House, and a pretty close presidential election."
"The mandate was simply, 'Replace Donald Trump and don't do anything drastic or stupid,'" said Jennings, who previously worked as a special assistant for former President George W. Bush and was a former campaign adviser Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
"And everything about this agenda is extremely drastic, and he has been angrier than I think people expected," Jennings said.
Jennings added that Biden has also been "more divisive" and "more partisan" than what Americans anticipated.
"You look at the issues," the CNN contributor noted. "We built five years of coverage on Trump out of Russia, COVID, and democracy."
"The president at his press conference invites Russia to invade the Ukraine," he said.
During Biden's rare press conference on Wednesday, he suggested that "minor incursion" by Russia into Ukraine might not warrant a strong international response. The White House has since walked back Biden's comments.
Jennings pointed out that there have been more COVID-19 deaths under Biden than Trump.
According to Worldometer data, there were 430,803 COVID-19 deaths from the start of the pandemic until Biden was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2020. As of Jan. 20, 2022, there were a total of 884,866 COVID-19 deaths, meaning that there were 454,063 COVID-19 deaths in Biden's first year as president — despite having the benefit of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies that Trump wasn't afforded.
During the presidential debate on Oct. 22, 2020, Biden told Trump, "Anyone who is responsible for that many deaths should not remain as president of the United States." At the time, there were approximately 220,000 U.S. COVID-19 deaths.
Days before the 2020 presidential election, then-candidate Joe Biden promised Americans, "I'm going to shut down the virus."
Jennings stated, "And now, we have the president and vice president and leading Democrats questioning the legitimacy of the 2022 election."
Jennings — who had been critical of Trump as president while contributing to CNN — slammed Biden, "Are we any better off on these three issues that we crucified Trump over?"
Jennings brought to light a new Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll that found just 28% of Americans want Biden to run for re-election in 2024, including only 48% of Democrats. The survey released on Thursday, said 43% of Americans approve of Biden's job performance versus 56% who disapprove.
"This is a disaster," Jennings declared.
Jennings accused Biden of not showing any interest in key issues such as "schools, crime, your quality of life kind of stuff."
Jennings also tore apart Biden's first year in office in an opinion piece published in the Courier Journal.
"After a year we see the reality: divisive, angry, out-of-touch and as dishonest as his predecessor," he wrote of Biden.
"If there’s a human embodiment of ambiguity, apprehension, and confusion, Biden is it," Jennings said.
Scott Jennings reflects on President Biden's "disaster" of a first year on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360
Saturday, October 9, 2021
Los Angeles County's democratic sheriff says he won't
enforce county's vaccine mandate because he can't afford to lose officers due
to defunding efforts
Leon WolfOctober
09, 2021
Democratic Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva says
that he does not plan to enforce the county's vaccine
requirement for his own deputies because he cannot afford to lose any
additional deputies due to the county's attempts to reduce funding for his
department.
In August, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Chair
Hilda Solis issued an executive order requiring all county employees to be
vaccinated by October 1st, without allowing for any exceptions, except for
certain narrowly-defined medical and religious reasons.
In his weekly question and answer session with local media
earlier this week, Villanueva explained why he would not be enforcing the order
among his own deputies. While he stated that he himself is vaccinated and that
he is strongly encouraging his deputies to be vaccinated, he noted that the
county budget for 2021-22 cuts his department's budget by about 4 percent,
which forces him to "pick and choose" which mandates from the county
to enforce.
Appearing on Fox News Friday night, Villanueva explained that his
department was already short-staffed by about 1,000 employees when it was hit
with what he called a "politically motivated" hiring freeze in
response to the Black Lives Matter protests last year.
With further cuts to his department coming next year,
Villanueva said that he considered the personnel situation in his department to
be a public safety issue, and that he could not in good conscience allow his
department to lose more officers due to vaccine-hesitancy. Villanueva estimated
that approximately 5-10 percent of his force has indicated that they will
refuse to get the vaccine, and that "hundreds" of them have told him
personally that they would rather lose their jobs than get the vaccine. Villanueva
went on to call the mandate "politicized" as well as "poorly
thought out [and] poorly executed."
"This issue has become so politicized, there are entire
groups of employees that are willing to be fired and laid off rather than get
vaccinated," Villanueva said earlier this week, according to Deadline. "So I don't want to be in a position to lose
5-10% of my workforce overnight."
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors has not yet
publicly responded to Villanueva's defiance of their order.
Separately, a group of Los Angeles Police Department
employees sued last month over the city's vaccine mandate,
alleging that the mandate violated their federal statutory and constitutional
rights.
Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia broke from his own party to torch the $3.5 trillion social welfare and climate change spending bill. Manchin proclaimed that the government spending trillions right now would be "fiscal insanity."
"Every Member of Congress has a solemn duty to vote for what they believe is best for the country and the American people, not their party," Manchin declared in a statement released Wednesday. "Respectfully, as I have said for months, I can't support $3.5 trillion more in spending when we have already spent $5.4 trillion since last March. At some point, all of us, regardless of party must ask the simple question — 'how much is enough?'"
"What I have made clear to the President and Democratic leaders is that spending trillions more on new and expanded government programs, when we can't even pay for the essential social programs, like Social Security and Medicare, is the definition of fiscal insanity," Manchin continued.
"Proposing a historic expansion of social programs while ignoring the fact we are not in a recession and that millions of jobs remain open will only feed a dysfunction that could weaken our economic recovery," Manchin said. "This is the shared reality we all now face, and it is this reality that must shape the future decisions that we, as elected leaders, must make."
Manchin proposed that "any expansion of social programs must be targeted to those in need, not expanded beyond what is fiscally possible." He also recommended that the tax code "be reformed to fix the flaws of the 2017 tax bill and ensure everyone pays their fair share but it should not weaken our global competitiveness or the ability of millions of small businesses to compete with the Amazons of the world."
The Democrat suggested, "The amount we spend now must be balanced with what we need and can afford — not designed to reengineer the social and economic fabric of this nation or vengefully tax for the sake of wishful spending."
Manchin sounded the alarm that spending trillions would cause even more inflation that would hurt American families.
The Consumer Price Index climbed 5.3% in August from a year earlier. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell warned lawmakers this week that inflation will likely continue in the coming months.
"While I am hopeful that common ground can be found that would result in another historic investment in our nation, I cannot — and will not — support trillions in spending or an all or nothing approach that ignores the brutal fiscal reality our nation faces," Manchin said.
"America is a great nation but great nations throughout history have been weakened by careless spending and bad policies," Manchin concluded. "Now, more than ever, we must work together to avoid these fatal mistakes so that we may fulfill our greatest responsibility as elected leaders and pass on a better America to the next generation."
The defiant statement could spell a potential death blow to the massive spending bill because Manchin's vote could derail the proposal. Republicans oppose the $3.5 trillion spending bill — which could cost between $5 trillion and $5.5 trillion over a decade. Democratic leadership desperately wants to pass the huge spending bill, but would need a simple majority of 51 votes in the Senate to pass it. That would require a "yes" vote from every Senate Democrat, including Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.). Both Manchin and Sinema have publicly opposed the hefty price tag of the bill.
Sinema said in July, "I have also made clear that while I will support beginning this process, I do not support a bill that costs $3.5 trillion — and in the coming months, I will work in good faith to develop this legislation with my colleagues and the administration to strengthen Arizona's economy and help Arizona's everyday families get ahead."
President Joe Biden reportedly canceled a planned trip to Chicago on Wednesday to attempt to get all Democrats on board with the spending bill.
"Biden reportedly met with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) at the White House Wednesday afternoon following a series of meetings Tuesday with Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), who oppose both the size of the social spending package and key provisions in it," the Fiscal Times reported.
Meanwhile, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) contended that the reconciliation bill should spend $3.5 trillion "at a minimum."
"If Mr. Manchin is concerned about the deficit — I think we all are, national debt — I'm sure he understands that this bill is not going add one nickel to the deficit because it's all going to be paid for by demanding the wealthy and large corporations starting to pay their fair share of taxes," Sanders said Wednesday, echoing the Democratic talking point that the entire $3.5 trillion in spending will "cost zero dollars" and be paid for by taxing wealthy Americans and big corporations.
See more at https://www.theblaze.com/news/biden-spending-bill-manchin-sinema?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20210930Trending-JoeManchin&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News
Four years ago, I wrote about my decision to live as a woman in The New York Times, writing that I had wanted to live “authentically as the woman that I have always been,” and had “effectively traded my white male privilege to become one of America’s most hated minorities.”
Three years ago, I decided that I was neither male nor female, but nonbinary—and made headlines after an Oregon judge agreed to let me identify as a third sex, not male or female.
Now, I want to live again as the man that I am.
I’m one of the lucky ones. Despite participating in medical transgenderism for six years, my body is still intact. Most people who desist from transgender identities after gender changes can’t say the same.
But that’s not to say I got off scot-free. My psyche is eternally scarred, and I’ve got a host of health issues from the grand medical experiment.
Here’s how things began.
After convincing myself that I was a woman during a severe mental health crisis, I visited a licensed nurse practitioner in early 2013 and asked for a hormone prescription. “If you don’t give me the drugs, I’ll buy them off the internet,” I threatened.
Although she’d never met me before, the nurse phoned in a prescription for 2 mg of oral estrogen and 200 mg of Spironolactone that very same day.
The nurse practitioner ignored that I have chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, having previously served in the military for almost 18 years. All of my doctors agree on that. Others believe that I have bipolar disorder and possibly borderline personality disorder.
I should have been stopped, but out-of-control, transgender activism had made the nurse practitioner too scared to say no.
I’d learned how to become a female from online medical documents at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital website.
After I began consuming the cross-sex hormones, I started therapy at a gender clinic in Pittsburgh so that I could get people to sign off on the transgender surgeries I planned to have.
All I needed to do was switch over my hormone operating fuel and get my penis turned into a vagina. Then I’d be the same as any other woman. That’s the fantasy the transgender community sold me. It’s the lie I bought into and believed.
Only one therapist tried to stop me from crawling into this smoking rabbit hole. When she did, I not only fired her, I filed a formal complaint against her. “She’s a gatekeeper,” the trans community said.
Professional stigmatisms against “conversion therapy” had made it impossible for the therapist to question my motives for wanting to change my sex.
The “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders” (Fifth Edition) says one of the traits of gender dysphoria is believing that you possess the stereotypical feelings of the opposite sex. I felt that about myself, but yet no therapist discussed it with me.
Two weeks hadn’t passed before I found a replacement therapist. The new one quickly affirmed my identity as a woman. I was back on the road to getting vaginoplasty.
There’s abundant online literature informing transgender people that their sex change isn’t real. But when a licensed medical doctor writes you a letter essentially stating that you were born in the wrong body and a government agency or court of law validates that delusion, you become damaged and confused. I certainly did.
Painful Roots
My trauma history resembles a ride down the Highway of Death during the first Gulf War.
As a child, I was sexually abused by a male relative. My parents severely beat me. At this point, I’ve been exposed to so much violence and had so many close calls that I don’t know how to explain why I’m still alive. Nor do I know how to mentally process some of the things I’ve seen and experienced.
Dr. Ray Blanchard has an unpopular theory that explains why someone like me may have been drawn to transgenderism. He claims there are two types of transgender women: homosexuals that are attracted to men, and men who are attracted to the thought or image of themselves as females.
It’s a tough thing to admit, but I belong to the latter group. We are classified as having autogynephilia.
After having watched pornography for years while in the Army and being married to a woman who resisted my demands to become the ideal female, I became that female instead. At least in my head.
While autogynephilia was my motivation to become a woman, gender stereotypes were my means of implementation. I believed wearing a long wig, dresses, heels, and makeup would make me a woman.
Feminists begged to differ on that. They rejected me for conforming to female stereotypes. But as a new member of the transgender community, I beat up on them too. The women who become men don’t fight the transgender community’s wars. The men in dresses do.
Medical Malpractice
The best thing that could have happened would have been for someone to order intensive therapy. That would have protected me from my inclination to cross-dress and my risky sexual transgressions, of which there were many.
Instead, quacks in the medical community hid me in the women’s bathroom with people’s wives and daughters. “Your gender identity is female,” these alleged professionals said.
The medical community is so afraid of the trans community that they’re now afraid to give someone Blanchard’s diagnosis. Trans men are winning in medicine, and they’ve won the battle for language.
Think of the word “transvestite.” They’ve succeeded in making it a vulgar word, even though it just means men dressing like women. People are no longer allowed to tell the truth about men like me. Everyone now has to call us transgender instead.
The diagnostic code in my records at the VA should read Transvestic Disorder (302.3). Instead, the novel theories of Judith Butler and Anne Fausto-Sterling have been used to cover up the truths written about by Blanchard, J. Michael Bailey, and Alice Dreger.
I confess to having been motivated by autogynephilia during all of this. Blanchard was right.
Trauma, hypersexuality owing to childhood sexual abuse, and autogynephilia are all supposed to be red flags for those involved in the medical arts of psychology, psychiatry, and physical medicine—yet nobody except for the one therapist in Pittsburgh ever tried to stop me from changing my sex. They just kept helping me to harm myself.
Escaping to ‘Nonbinary’
Three years into my gender change from male to female, I looked hard into the mirror one day. When I did, the facade of femininity and womanhood crumbled.
Despite having taken or been injected with every hormone and antiandrogen concoction in the VA’s medical arsenal, I didn’t look anything like a female. People on the street agreed. Their harsh stares reflected the reality behind my fraudulent existence as a woman. Biological sex is immutable.
It took three years for that reality to set in with me.
When the fantasy of being a woman came to an end, I asked two of my doctors to allow me to become nonbinary instead of female to bail me out. Both readily agreed.
After pumping me full of hormones—the equivalent of 20 birth control pills per day—they each wrote a sex change letter. The two weren’t just bailing me out. They were getting themselves off the hook for my failed sex change. One worked at the VA. The other worked at Oregon Health & Science University.
To escape the delusion of having become a woman, I did something completely unprecedented in American history. In 2016, I convinced an Oregon judge to declare my sex to be nonbinary—neither male nor female.
In my psychotic mind, I had restored the mythical third sex to North America. And I became the first legally recognized nonbinary person in the country.
Celebrity Status
The landmark court decision catapulted me to instant fame within the LGBT community. For 10 nonstop days afterward, the media didn’t let me sleep. Reporters hung out in my Facebook feed, journalists clung to my every word, and a Portland television station beamed my wife and I into living rooms in the United Kingdom.
Becoming a woman had gotten me into The New York Times. Convincing a judge that my sex was nonbinary got my photos and story into publications around the world.
Then, before the judge’s ink had even dried on my Oregon sex change court order, a Washington, D.C.-based LGBT legal aid organization contacted me. “We want to help you change your birth certificate,” they offered.
Within months, I scored another historic win after the Department of Vital Records issued me a brand new birth certificate from Washington, D.C., where I was born. A local group called Whitman-Walker Health had gotten my sex designation on my birth certificate switched to “unknown.” It was the first time in D.C. history a birth certificate had been printed with a sex marker other than male or female.
Another transgender legal aid organization jumped on the Jamie Shupe bandwagon, too. Lambda Legal used my nonbinary court order to help convince a Colorado federal judge to order the State Department to issue a passport with an X marker (meaning nonbinary) to a separate plaintiff named Dana Zzyym.
LGBT organizations helping me to screw up my life had become a common theme. During my prior sex change to female, the New York-based Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund had gotten my name legally changed. I didn’t like being named after the uncle who’d molested me. Instead of getting me therapy for that, they got me a new name.
A Pennsylvania judge didn’t question the name change, either. Wanting to help a transgender person, she had not only changed my name, but at my request she also sealed the court order, allowing me to skip out on a ton of debt I owed because of a failed home purchase and begin my new life as a woman. Instead of merging my file, two of the three credit bureaus issued me a brand new line of credit.
Walking Away From Fiction
It wasn’t until I came out against the sterilization and mutilation of gender-confused children and transgender military service members in 2017 that LGBT organizations stopped helping me. Most of the media retreated with them.
Overnight, I went from being a liberal media darling to a conservative pariah.
Both groups quickly began to realize that the transgender community had a runaway on their hands. Their solution was to completely ignore me and what my story had become. They also stopped acknowledging that I was behind the nonbinary option that now exists in 11 states.
The truth is that my sex change to nonbinary was a medical and scientific fraud. Consider the fact that before the historic court hearing occurred, my lawyer informed me that the judge had a transgender child.
Sure enough, the morning of my brief court hearing, the judge didn’t ask me a single question. Nor did this officer of the court demand to see any medical evidence alleging that I was born something magical. Within minutes, the judge just signed off on the court order.
I do not have any disorders of sexual development. All of my sexual confusion was in my head. I should have been treated. Instead, at every step, doctors, judges, and advocacy groups indulged my fiction.
The carnage that came from my court victory is just as precedent-setting as the decision itself. The judge’s order led to millions of taxpayer dollars being spent to put an X marker on driver’s licenses in 11 states so far. You can now become male, female, or nonbinary in all of them.
In my opinion, the judge in my case should have recused herself. In doing so, she would have spared me the ordeal still yet to come. She also would have saved me from having to bear the weight of the big secret behind my win.
I now believe that she wasn’t just validating my transgender identity. She was advancing her child’s transgender identity, too.
A sensible magistrate would have politely told me no and refused to sign such an outlandish legal request. “Gender is just a concept. Biological sex defines all of us,” that person would have said.
In January 2019, unable to advance the fraud for another single day, I reclaimed my male birth sex. The weight of the lie on my conscience was heavier than the value of the fame I’d gained from participating in this elaborate swindle.
Two fake gender identities couldn’t hide the truth of my biological reality. There is no third gender or third sex. Like me, intersex people are either male or female. Their condition is the result of a disorder of sexual development, and they need help and compassion.
I played my part in pushing forward this grand illusion. I’m not the victim here. My wife, daughter, and the American taxpayers are—they are the real victims. (For more from the author of “I Was America’s First ‘Nonbinary’ Person. It Was All a Sham.” please click HERE)
See more at https://joemiller.us/2019/03/i-was-americas-first-nonbinary-person-it-was-all-a-sham/
A video that splices together clips of prominent Democrats and progressives openly calling for political unrest is now trending online as the nation continues to be gripped by violence and riots in the streets.
The video, produced by Caldron Pool, has garnered 2.5 million views since being posted to Twitter on Sunday.
In its original post, the Caldron Pool account asks, "how did you think it would end?" insinuating that progressives' calls for violence have indeed given rise to the violence now playing out in communities across the country such as Portland, Oregon; Kenosha, Wisconsin; and Chicago.
BlazeTV host Elijah Schaffer — who has reported on much of the violence firsthand and has even had a gun pointed in his face as a result — tweeted out the video, calling it "the most important video of 2020."
Fellow BlazeTV host Steven Crowder suggested that the video be immediately turned into an ad for President Donald Trump's re-election campaign.
What are the details?
"I just don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country," Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) says as the video opens, adding, "Maybe there will be."
The video then cuts to clips from two separate MSNBC newscasts where one contributors says, "People need to start taking to the streets" in opposition to Trump and then progressive Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) says, "There needs to be unrest in the streets."
After that, CNN host Chris Cuomo is shown saying, "Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful," against a backdrop of news about widespread looting and vandalism in New York City.
Elsewhere in the video, liberal reporters, Hollywood celebrities, and politicians — including Democratic nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden — can be heard calling for violence against the president and antagonizing his supporters.
"If we were in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him," Biden said about Trump in 2018.
Why does it matter?
Many Americans have become increasingly frustrated as protests against racial injustice and police brutality have devolved into violent riots over the last several months, seemingly with little or no opposition from Democratic leaders.
Democratic officials in many cities where violent riots have taken place have often acquiesced to demands to cut police budgets even as lawlessness runs rampant.
In response, President Trump has called out the violence and has made law and order a major theme of his re-election campaign, suggesting that if Democrats have their way, the violence will only continue and increase.
"Make no mistake, if you give power to Joe Biden, the radical left will defund police departments all across America," Trump said in his speech at the Republican National Convention last week. "They will pass federal legislation to reduce law enforcement nationwide. They will make every city look like Democrat-run Portland, Oregon."
