Article by Judicial Watch
A large number of non-citizens cast ballots in U.S. elections and it’s possible that the illegal votes were responsible for President Obama’s 2008 victory, according to an in-depth academic study that confirms Judicial Watch’s assessment that foreign nationals have helped Democrats steal elections.
Non-citizens tend to favor Democrats and Obama won more than 80% of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 sample gathered by the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), a large-scale academic survey project operated by teams of researchers from across the country. In fact, enough ineligible voters cast ballots in 2008 to conceivably account for Democratic victories in a few close elections, CCES researchers found. A respected Ivy League professor is coordinator of the CCES which has produced national sample surveys, stratified by state and type of district, in every federal election since 2006. This allows the optimal study of congressional and state races as well as an ideal setting for understanding the relationship between the congressional and presidential elections.
The CCES is an esteemed and highly respected operation that recently published shocking information, gathered from big social science survey datasets, that supports Judicial Watch’s work in this area. In 2012 JW launched the Election Integrity Project, a widespread legal campaign to clean up voter registration rolls and support election integrity measures across the country. Our investigations immediately uncovered data that proved voter rolls in a number of states—including Mississippi, Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Texas, Florida, California and Colorado—contained the names of individuals who are ineligible to vote.
Now the CCES confirms this, specifically that large numbers
of foreign nationals vote in U.S.
elections. The “participation was large enough to plausibly account for
Democratic victories in a few close elections,” according to a mainstream
newspaper article written by two of the political science
college professors that conducted the study. “Non-citizen votes could have
given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in
order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in
the 111th Congress,” the researchers write. “Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won
election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65
percent of Minnesota
non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that
non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina . Obama
won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina ’s adult non-citizens would
have provided this victory margin.”
Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But
enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races, the
professors confirm. More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and
2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote and some actually
voted. Based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified
vote, 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens
voted in 2010. This is outrageous, to say that least, and illustrates the need
to clean up voter rolls in this country.
“This is a major story and confirms JW’s working theory that
foreign nationals illegally vote in federal elections in large numbers and have
allowed Democrats, including this president, to steal elections,” said Judicial
Watch President Tom Fitton. “This is why the Left does not want voter ID, loves
same day registration, by mail voting, etc. and craves amnesty and open
borders. It is not about the Hispanic vote – it is about the illegal alien vote
(and the legal alien vote), it is about stealing elections. Makes all the
talk about targeting, messaging, issues, candidates, and policy seem quaint.”
Read more: http://joemiller.us/2014/10/judicial-watch-obama-may-elected-illegal-votes/#ixzz3Hju1mg3x
No comments:
Post a Comment